62nd National Congress of the Italian Society of Rheumatology
Vol. 77 No. s1 (2025): Abstract book of the 62th Conference of the Italian Society for Rheumatology, Rimini, 26-29 November 2025

PO:37:259 | Is there a seasonal pattern in giant cell arteritis? Revisiting the evidence in a large monocentric cohort of 1203 patients

Milena Bond1, Philipp Bosch2, Aaron Juche3, Hans Bastian3, Wolfgang Schmidt4. | 1Department of Rheumatology, Hospital of Bruneck ASAA-SABES, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsius Medical University Brunico Italy; 2Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; 3Medical Centre for Rheumatology Berlin-Buch, Immanuel Krankenhaus Berlin Berlin Germany; 4Waldfriede Hospital, Rheumatology, Berlin, Germany.

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 26 November 2025
77
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Background. Whether the disease onset in giant cell arteritis (GCA) exhibits a seasonal pattern remains unclear. Previous studies have yielded conflicting evidence: some report no seasonality, while others suggest seasonal variation, though findings are inconsistent and difficult to compare, especially due to methodological limitations, including small cohort sizes and reliance on diagnosis or biopsy dates rather than symptoms onset. We aimed to clarify whether a seasonal pattern exists by analyzing a large cohort using the date of symptom onset as the temporal reference.

 

Materials and Methods. Consecutive patients from a large monocentric GCA (1994–2024) with a documented date of symptom onset were included. To ensure balanced seasonal representation, patients with symptom onset outside the period of December 1, 1994, to November 30, 2023, were excluded. Meteorological seasons were used for the analysis (spring: Mar–May; summer: Jun–Aug; autumn: Sep–Nov; winter: Dec–Feb). To assess whether symptom onsets were equally distributed across seasons (25% per season), we applied an exact multinomial test using the “ExactMultinom” package in R. Sensitivity analyses were performed for subgroups by sex and clinical phenotype (cranial vs extracranial involvement), with Bonferroni-Holm correction for multiple testing.

 

Results. Of 1203 patients in the full cohort, 1149 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the main analysis (population’s characteristics are reported in Table 1). The overall seasonal distribution of symptom onset was: spring 292 (25.4%), summer 276 (24.0%), autumn 271 (23.6%), winter 310 (27.0%) (p = 0.36). Figure 1 illustrates the seasonal distribution of symptom onset stratified by years across the study period. Subgroup analyses revealed no overall significant seasonal variation as shown in Table 2.

 

Conclusions. This large, single-center cohort study using symptom onset data found no evidence of a significant seasonal pattern in the disease onset of GCA patients.

mceclip0-7c79e3135deeab2e4805c3548c9ab241.jpg

24_20250512093019.jpg

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite



1.
PO:37:259 | Is there a seasonal pattern in giant cell arteritis? Revisiting the evidence in a large monocentric cohort of 1203 patients: Milena Bond1, Philipp Bosch2, Aaron Juche3, Hans Bastian3, Wolfgang Schmidt4. | 1Department of Rheumatology, Hospital of Bruneck ASAA-SABES, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsius Medical University Brunico Italy; 2Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; 3Medical Centre for Rheumatology Berlin-Buch, Immanuel Krankenhaus Berlin Berlin Germany; 4Waldfriede Hospital, Rheumatology, Berlin, Germany. Reumatismo [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 26 [cited 2026 Jan. 19];77(s1). Available from: https://www.reumatismo.org/reuma/article/view/2097