62nd National Congress of the Italian Society of Rheumatology
Vol. 77 No. s1 (2025): Abstract book of the 62th Conference of the Italian Society for Rheumatology, Rimini, 26-29 November 2025

PO:23:051 | Quantitative high-resolution computed tomography analysis in Sjögren’s disease-associated interstitial lung disease: CALIPER-derived imaging biomarkers for prognostic assessment

Gaetano La Rocca1, Francesco Ferro1, Vincenzo Uggenti2, Beatrice Dei1, Giovanni Fulvio1, Michele Moretti1, Chiara Romei2, Marta Mosca1, Chiara Baldini1. | 1University of Pisa, Rheumatology Unit, Clinical and Experimental Medicine Department, Pisa, Italy; 2Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 26 November 2025
79
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Background. Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a frequent manifestation of Sjögren’s Disease (SjD), associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, data on the prevalence of progressive-ILD in SjD remain scarce, and biomarkers for predicting progression are lacking. Computer-Aided Lung Informatics for Pathology Evaluation and Rating (CALIPER) is a validated CT-based software that quantifies ILD patterns such as ground-glass opacities, reticulation, honeycombing, and low attenuation areas. CALIPER-derived parameters correlate with pulmonary function tests (PFT) and outcomes in IPF and other autoimmune ILDs, but their role in SjD-ILD is unexplored. Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of CALIPER-derived parameters in SjD-ILD patients

 

Materials and Methods. SjD patients (2016 ACR/EULAR criteria) with HRCT-confirmed ILD followed from Jan-2018 to Sep-2023 were retrospectively included if >/=1 HRCT was suitable for CALIPER analysis. Clinical, laboratory and PFT data were collected at baseline and follow-up. Progressive-fibrosing ILD (PF-ILD) was defined (ATS criteria) by >/=2 of: worsening symptoms, FVC decline >/=5% or DLCO >/=10%, or radiological progression within 1 year. CALIPER-derived ILD% (sum of ground-glass, reticular, honeycombing) and VRS% (vascular-related structures) were calculated. Visual ILD extent (Warrick score) and pattern were assessed by a thoracic radiologist

 

Results. Twenty-three patients (F:M=18:5, mean age 66.2±9.5 yrs, mean follow-up 6.1±5 yrs) were enrolled. ILD patterns included NSIP (n=14), UIP (n=6), and NSIP+OP (n=3). Dyspnea and cough occurred in 21 and 19 patients respectively. Median baseline FVC and DLCO were 83% and 64%. Seventeen patients received immunosuppressants; none received antifibrotics. Seven required long-term oxygen (LTO2) and 7 developed PF-ILD. Baseline ILD% and VRS% demonstrated a moderate-strong correlation with FCV% and DLCO%, visual ILD quantification (Warrick score) and between them (table 1). VRS%, Reticulation%, and Honeycombing% were significantly higher in UIP (p=.021, .038, .047 respectively). On univariate regression analysis, VRS% (OR 3.2, 95%CI 1.1-9.1, p=.03) and ILD% (OR 1.13, 95%CI 1.01-1.3, p=.05) were associated with LTO2. According to ROC analysis, VRS% had an AUC of 0.813 (p=.019) with an optimal cut-off of 3.8% yielding a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 87.5% in predicting LTO2. ILD% had an AUC of 0.777 (p=.038) with a cut-off of 11.6% resulting in a 71.4% sensitivity and a 75% specificity in predicting LTO2. On univariate analysis VRS% (OR 2.8, 95%CI 1-8, p=.05) was associated with a PF-ILD behavior in the next year, with an AUC of 0.85 (p=.023) and an optimal cut-off of 3.8% resulting in a 83.3% sensitivity and 80% specificity.

 

Conclusions. CALIPER-derived parameters correlate strongly with lung function and predict adverse outcomes in SjD-ILD. Automated HRCT analysis offers promising digital biomarkers for ILD assessment and risk stratification. Integrating these metrics with clinical and functional data could support early identification of progressive-ILD and guide therapy. Further validation in larger cohorts is warranted.


mceclip0-0b5a67493c3f02d34076d232cf1c9307.jpg

177_20250601171205.jpg

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite



1.
PO:23:051 | Quantitative high-resolution computed tomography analysis in Sjögren’s disease-associated interstitial lung disease: CALIPER-derived imaging biomarkers for prognostic assessment: Gaetano La Rocca1, Francesco Ferro1, Vincenzo Uggenti2, Beatrice Dei1, Giovanni Fulvio1, Michele Moretti1, Chiara Romei2, Marta Mosca1, Chiara Baldini1. | 1University of Pisa, Rheumatology Unit, Clinical and Experimental Medicine Department, Pisa, Italy; 2Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy. Reumatismo [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 26 [cited 2026 Jan. 19];77(s1). Available from: https://www.reumatismo.org/reuma/article/view/2055