Original Articles

Telerheumatology to improve first access outcomes in outpatients: a prospective monocentric pilot study

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 22 June 2026
5
Views
2
Downloads

Authors

Objective. The present pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of a 'teletriagerheum' service before the first rheumatology visit and identify potential benefits and disadvantages by comparing a regular visit with a first face-to-face visit preceded by the ‘teletriagerheum' service.

Methods. A prospective monocentric pilot study was conducted from October to December 2021. Consecutive patients were contacted to investigate their willingness to receive a phone call ('teletriagerheum' service) from a physician of the Rheumatology Unit before the first rheumatology visit. The number of definite diagnoses at the first visit in the 'teletriagerheum' group was compared with patients receiving a regular first visit, as well as socio-demographic characteristics, the reason for the visit, face-to-face visit duration, and the number of additional exams.

Results. Overall, 75 patients performed the 'teletriagerheum' ('teletriagerheum' group), and 74 patients were included in the control group. In the 'teletriagerheum' group, a higher number of conclusive diagnoses was observed (72% vs. 58%, p=0.020) with a higher probability of receiving a conclusive diagnosis compared with the control group, both at univariate [odds ratio (OR) 2.28, p=0.021] and multivariate analyses adjusting for the only differences between the two groups (marital status and information and communication technologies skills; OR 2.95, p=0.007). At the first face-to-face visit, fewer additional tests were prescribed in the 'teletriagerheum' group; however, the overall number of tests (including those prescribed during teletriage) was higher.

Conclusions. A telephone-based telerheumatology service could be an effective triage tool for first visits of new outpatients, enabling more definitive diagnoses, thanks in part to the ability to perform the required investigations in a timely manner in most cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Hoy D, Smith E, Bettampadi D, Mansournia MA, et al. Global, regional and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis 1990-2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78: 1463-71.
Battafarano DF, Ditmyer M, Bolster MB, Fitzgerald JD, Deal C, Bass AR, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology workforce study: supply and demand projections of adult rheumatology workforce, 2015-2030. Arthritis Care Res 2018; 70: 617-26.
de Thurah A, Bosch P, Marques A, Meissner Y, Mukhtyar CB, Knitza J, et al. 2022 EULAR points to consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 2022; 81: 1065-71.
Carr ECJ, Ortiz MM, Patel JN, Barber CEH, Katz S, Robert J, et al. Models of arthritis care: a systems-level evaluation of acceptability as a dimension of quality of care. J Rheumatol 2020; 47: 1431-9.
Graham LE, McGimpsey S, Wright S, McClean G, Carser J, Stevenson M, et al. Could a low-cost audio-visual link be useful in rheumatology? J Telemed Telecare 2000; 6: S35-7.
Piga M, Floris A, Congia M, Chessa E, Cangemi I, Cauli A. Telemedicine in rheumatology: high specificity and sensitivity of follow-up virtual video consultations during COVID-19 pandemic. Rheumatology 2022; 61: 1795-801.
Dejaco C, Landewé RBM. Controversies in rheumatology: telemedicine-friend or foe? Rheumatology 2023; 62: 2661-4.
Piga M, Cangemi I, Mathieu A, Cauli A. Telemedicine for patients with rheumatic diseases: Systematic review and proposal for research agenda. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2017; 47: 121-8.
Nguyen-Oghalai TU, Hunter K, Lyon M. Telerheumatology: the VA experience. South Med J 2018; 111: 359-62.
Piovesan DM, Busato VB, da Silveira RG, do Prado AD, Molina-Bastos CG, Hickmann S, et al. Quality of referrals to a rheumatology service before and after implementation of a triage system with telemedicine support. Adv Rheumatol 2021; 61: 47.
Poulsen KA, Millen CM, Lakshman UI, Buttner PG, Roberts LJ. Satisfaction with rural rheumatology telemedicine service. Int J Rheum Dis 2015; 18: 304-14.
Predmore ZS, Roth E, Breslau J, Fischer SH, Uscher-Pines L. Assessment of patient preferences for telehealth in post-COVID-19 pandemic health care. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4: e2136405.
Danila MI, Gavigan K, Rivera E, Nowell WB, George MD, Curtis JR, et al. Patient perceptions and preferences regarding telemedicine for autoimmune rheumatic diseases care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Arthritis Care Res 2022; 74: 1049-57.

Ethics Approval

The study was conducted within the protocol approved by the ethics committee Milano Area 3 (Code n. 118-04032021).

How to Cite



1.
Telerheumatology to improve first access outcomes in outpatients: a prospective monocentric pilot study. Reumatismo [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 22 [cited 2026 Jun. 24];. Available from: https://www.reumatismo.org/reuma/article/view/1843