Contributions of paleorheumatology to understanding contemporary disease

Abstract Views: 784
PDF: 1116
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Accuracy of paleontologic perspectives, understanding disease states, hypothesis formation, and technology form the basis for this review. Moodie's (1) effort, in isolation, to attribute diagnoses to paleontologic observations were originally met with skepticism (Don Baird, personal and graphic communication) and have not stood the test of time (2, 3). Familarization with the technology should allow innovative approaches to mainstream paleontologic questions. Collaborative efforts should allow avoidance of some of the pitfalls of that technology. When all parties to such collaboration must convince each other of the appropriateness of their "pronouncements," confidence is generated in the conclusions...

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Rothschild, B. (2002). Contributions of paleorheumatology to understanding contemporary disease. Reumatismo, 54(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2002.272