Differences in pharmacology of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists

Abstract Views: 1000
PDF: 1642
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The commercially available inhibitors of TNF are constituted by two classes of molecules: the soluble receptors (Etanercept: Amgen Inc. Wyeth) and the monoclonal antibodies (Adalimumab: Abbott Laboratories and Infliximab: Centocor, Inc.). The differences in their molecular structure, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) are discussed, along with the differences concerning dose, administration regimens, drug concentrations and pharmacological interactions. In order to explain the clinical differences observed when these agents are used in the “real world”, which can arise from the respective PK characteristics (kinetics, route and frequency of administration, type of TNF binding, effects on cytokines) and PD responses and peculiar mechanisms of action, with distinctive immune function (LFTa inactivation; apoptosis induction, TNF immunoprecipitation, C1q binding and CDC induction; Fcg cross-linking and ADCC induction), the dynamics of interaction of the two classes of neutralizing molecules with TNF, and the ability in restoring TNF homeostasis, are outlined.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Fiocco, U., & Bombardieri, S. (2005). Differences in pharmacology of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. Reumatismo, 57(s4), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2005.4s.8